Fixed-scope technical intervention · global B2B
You bring one existing verification flow that is unstable, slow or too manual. LaCurent reproduces the issue, repairs the automation in your authorized environment, validates it and hands back the changed files, execution evidence and run instructions.
Where the intervention can focus
The work is implemented in the client’s existing authorized environment. Scope, inputs, output and acceptance criteria are agreed before work starts.
When hardware and software change faster than qualification and system test can absorb the updates.
A test architecture that is cheaper to update across software releases and PCB variants: centralized parameters, reusable helpers, version-aware setup, explicit expected-versus-actual checks and qualification-ready reporting.
When sessions, DTC/OBD checks, negative paths or recovery are still manual.
Automated session handling, NRC checks, fault injection, DTC/OBD verification, reset/wake-up flows, recovery criteria and reusable diagnostic helpers.
When every PCB sample requires physical environment work, new components or bench adaptation before useful verification can even start.
Move suitable checks away from repeated physical-environment dependence, keep only genuinely hardware-dependent verification on HIL, reuse test intent across levels and reduce setup, recovery and execution time.
Quick bottleneck check
Choose any relevant problem, or describe it in one sentence. Extra details are optional. Preview and copy a concise technical brief, or open it in your email app. Nothing is submitted automatically.
Why this is credible
Automotive software qualification and system integration since 2022, including requirements-based testing, timing, fault reactions, regression automation and qualification evidence.
ASPICECANoe/CAPL automation for UDS services, DTC/OBD checks, fault injection, sleep/wake-up, recovery behaviour and deterministic reporting.
CAN · LIN · DoIP · Vector VT / HILEmbedded C, diagnostic-stack extensions, bootloader/version integration, build configurations and target-level HW/SW debugging.
TI C2000 · target debugging · integrationFor one qualification workflow, moving suitable verification away from repeated physical-environment adaptation cut execution from multi-day HIL cycles — including setup and recovery from bench issues — to roughly two hours. It also avoided repeated hardware-component purchases and environment rework from PCB sample to PCB sample. This is a past engineering result, not a blanket performance guarantee.
Current project experience is primarily automotive. Aerospace-oriented work is positioned through transferable safety-critical verification discipline; we do not claim aerospace project history.
Resources
Instead of generic blog content, the resource library turns anonymized technical struggles into reusable verification patterns.
Have a verification bottleneck?
Use the short check above or email the current failure pattern directly. The first conversation should identify the smallest useful engineering scope.